Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everybody has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have actually produced a petition in an attempt to force a statewide vote on set up casino tasks is able to maneuver forward.
Those that are against the casinos that are new able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the lawyer general’s office. But regrettably for them, the continuing state solicitor however a stop to the move, saying that the ballot question wouldn’t be legal under the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
Beneath the ongoing state Constitution, the ballot initiative process is included in Article 48. That article not just describes the process for getting question on the ballot, but additionally establishes exactly what can and may not be included in such concerns. One of the rules for proposals states that they cannot restrict an entity’s ‘right to receive settlement for private property appropriated to public use’.
In accordance with state solicitor Peter Sacks, if the relevant question were to be authorized by the public, thus closing the casino deals immediately, it would simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away with no compensation. Continue reading “Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG”